Its rare and inspiring to find a man of absolute integrity. A true teacher who finds joy in sharing what he perceives of the world around him. Many thanks for your meticulous care in providing guidance.
What we need in this world is more all rounders. More social scientists who set out to make the world a better place for everyone.
For the reader, even a better fake video may not make much of a difference, as he would already have developed mechanisms to deal with written content that claims to be yours but isn’t.
You have been so generous with your content, and I do wonder about your viewpoints on the possibilities of AI. I somehow think that you believe in some fundamental truth that what you have done cannot be really taken over by bots. I understand that you don’t even care if it does, but I am curious about the perspective or rather philosophy behind it.
Prof. Damodaran, Liked the assessment. It looks like an expert's assessment of Internet content. What would be interesting is to assess it by looking at its ability to fool an *average* reader - someone who has heard Prof. Damodaran as a valuation guru/author. I am not sure if the message consistency category holds for an average reader, and even if it holds, the AI-content would be rated at F. I have been a reader of your blog, and I wouldn't be fooled by this content. But there may be many who don't like reading and like quick tips like these. --Vinay Dabholkar
Thank you Prof. Damodaran for so generously sharing your knowledge and abilities.
People who are falling for such scams are the same people who are looking for impressive returns, big promises, and the next golden duck.
The rest (unfortunately few) have one thing in common : they do control their greed and use common sense.
Its rare and inspiring to find a man of absolute integrity. A true teacher who finds joy in sharing what he perceives of the world around him. Many thanks for your meticulous care in providing guidance.
What we need in this world is more all rounders. More social scientists who set out to make the world a better place for everyone.
For the reader, even a better fake video may not make much of a difference, as he would already have developed mechanisms to deal with written content that claims to be yours but isn’t.
You have been so generous with your content, and I do wonder about your viewpoints on the possibilities of AI. I somehow think that you believe in some fundamental truth that what you have done cannot be really taken over by bots. I understand that you don’t even care if it does, but I am curious about the perspective or rather philosophy behind it.
Thank you, great insights and angles as always! Have a great day!
Prof. Damodaran, Liked the assessment. It looks like an expert's assessment of Internet content. What would be interesting is to assess it by looking at its ability to fool an *average* reader - someone who has heard Prof. Damodaran as a valuation guru/author. I am not sure if the message consistency category holds for an average reader, and even if it holds, the AI-content would be rated at F. I have been a reader of your blog, and I wouldn't be fooled by this content. But there may be many who don't like reading and like quick tips like these. --Vinay Dabholkar